Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115155 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22831 of 2025 Applicant :- Sarita Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rohit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Rohit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Raj Bahadur Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 128 of 2025, under Sections- 61(2), 316(5) B.N.S., Police Station- Baraut, District- Baghpat, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was not named in the first information report. Subsequently, in the statement of one Ankur Tomar, who was the driver of the vehicle that was being used by the company to carry cash to load the A.T.M., the name of the applicant was roped in with the allegation that the applicant and other persons were discussing about their need of Rs. 56 crores. It is submitted that there is no recovery of any cash from the possession of the applicant and she has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. He further submitted that the co-accused Kajal has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.22238 of 2025 vide order dated 27.06.2025. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and she is languishing in jail since 13.03.2025. In case, she is granted bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Sarita, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 sailesh Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad