Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68643 (ALL)

LAKSHMI SHANKAR v. VANDANA SHUKLA AND 6 OTHERS

A227/6403/2025 · 2025-07-02

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103128 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6403 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lakshmi Shankar Respondent :- Vandana Shukla And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Chaturvedi,U.C. Chaturvedi Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed against the order dated 21.05.2025 passed by Additional Civil Judge (J.D.)/Court No. 5, Prayagraj by which the application for temporary injunction filed by the petitioner has been rejected. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of C.P.C. against the order impugned. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. 6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad