Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6864 (KER)

C.K. PRASAD v. STATE OF KERALA

Crl.MC/3299/2025 · 2025-04-10

P G Ajithkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Crl.M.C. No.3299 of 2025 2025:KER:31123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025/20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 3299 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER IN FIR NO.4 OF 2013 OF ENQUIRY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL JUDGE (VIGILANCE), MUVATTUPUZHA PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 3: 1 C.K. PRASAD AGED 60 YEARS S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, CHANGAKAL HOUSE, PANICKANKUDY P.O., KONNATHADY VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT., PIN - 685571 2 BAIJU K.K. AGED 55 YEARS S/O. P. KARMACHANDRAN, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, MANGALAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, THONNAKKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695317, RESIDING AT ‘KARMA, KARICHARA, PALLIPPURAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 695316 BY ADVS. BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA ARCHANA K.S. MOHAMMED SHAFI.K NOEL EALIAS RESPONDENTS/STATE: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VIGILANCE & ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, THODUPUZHA, MUTTOM, NEAR COURT COMPLEX, IDUKKI DISTRICT., PIN - 685587 2 Crl.M.C. No.3299 of 2025 2025:KER:31123 ADV.SMT REKHA S - SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ADV.SRI A RAJESH - SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(VIG) THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: 3 Crl.M.C. No.3299 of 2025 2025:KER:31123 P.G. AJITHKUMAR, J ------------------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3299 of 2025 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April, 2025 O R D E R This petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed seeking to quash the final report in FIR No.04/2013/IDK of Vigilance and Anti- Corruption Bureau, Idukki. Today, when this matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition saying that the final report was quashed by this Court in another proceedings. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE SMF