Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6864 (KAR)

SMT.PREMA MURUGESH PATIL, v. THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

WP/114390/2015 · 2025-03-14

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4801 WP No. 114390 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 114390 OF 2015 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. PREMA MURUGESH PATIL, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: MALLAPUR VILLAGE, BAILHONGAL TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRUTHVI K.S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR (GENERAL) 2. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DISTRICT COURT, BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.V.VIDYULATHA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER/COMMUNICATION DATED 30.06.2015, BEARING NO.ADM/9307/2015 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND ETC. Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4801 WP No. 114390 of 2015 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. Even on the last occasion, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R.NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 19 Sl No.: 13