Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68635 (PNJ)

JASVINDER RANA v. UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND ORS

CRM-M/31912/2025 · 2025-07-10

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31912-2025 DECIDED ON: 10.07.2025 JASVINDER RANA .....PETITIONER VERSUS UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND ORS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Vineet Jakhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Balram Singh, Addl. PP. UT. Chandigarh. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 528 of BNSS seeking to respondent No.2 to register an FIR against respondents No.6 to 8 or in the alternate issue appropriate direction to respondent No.2 to conclude the inquiry on the representation dated 11.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) submitted by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 11.04.2025 (Annexure P-3), within a time bound manner. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh to look into the representation dated 11.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks by passing a speaking order. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 10.07.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.07.11 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document