Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68624 (PNJ)

RAHUL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/17252/2025 · 2025-07-01

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17252-2025 Date of Decision: 01.07.2025 Rahul ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to consider and grant him compassionate appointment in view of death of his father. 2. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana, who on advance notice is present in Court, at the outset, submits that petitioner has already been extended financial assistance to the tume of Rs.10,00,000/-, thus, he is not entitled to compassionate appointment. 3. Faced with this, Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw instant petition. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn. 01.07.2025 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No Shivani Gupta 2025.07.01 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document