[2025:RJ-JP:36382-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc IIIrd Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 341/2025 in D. B. Criminal Appeal No.99/2022 Smt. Ramoli Wife Of Pyare Lal, Resident Of Village Richoli, Police Station Ucchain, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) At Present Accused Confined In Women Reformative Centre, Sewar Bharatpur ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Deputy Government Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 09/09/2025 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been convicted and sentence to undergo life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC read with Section 120-B of IPC. 3. Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that accused-applicant is in judicial custody. Counsel [2025:RJ-JP:36382-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-341/2025] further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that accused- applicant was on bail during trial. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant has served the sentence for period of more than four and a half years. Counsel further submits that the accused- applicant is a seventy-six years old lady and the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future and prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and he be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate opposed the application seeking suspension of sentence. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the age of the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant is a seventy-six years lady and hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 7. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 17.10.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:36382-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-341/2025] 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (SAMEER JAIN),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/6