IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68654 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2022 Thana- SONBERSHA RAJ District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1. Amrendra Yadav S/o- Late Tilo Yadav Village- Mohanpur, Ward No 14, Ps- Sonbarsa Raj, Dist- Saharsa 2. Sikendra Yadav S/o- Late Baldeo Yadav Village- Mohanpur, Ward No 14, Ps- Sonbarsa Raj, Dist- Saharsa 3. Komal Devi W/o- Navin Yadav @ Navin Kumar Yadav Village- Mohanpur, Ward No 14, Ps- Sonbarsa Raj, Dist- Saharsa 4. Bipin Kumar Yadav @ Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Yadav S/o- Sikendra Yadav Village- Mohanpur, Ward No 14, Ps- Sonbarsa Raj, Dist- Saharsa 5. Navin Yadav @ Navin Kumar Yadav S/o- Sikendra Yadav Village- Mohanpur, Ward No 14, Ps- Sonbarsa Raj, Dist- Saharsa 6. Meena Devi W/o- Sikendra Yadav Village- Mohanpur, Ward No 14, Ps- Sonbarsa Raj, Dist- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Satish Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 10-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 379, 307, 354, 448, 380, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per prosecution case, on 22.06.2022 at 12PM, all the F.I.R. named accused person, including these petitioners, abused and assaulted informant and her family members with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68654 of 2024(3) dt.10-02-2025 2/3 lathi, danda and spade. It is further alleged that all the accused persons, ransacked the house of informant and fled away after issuing threats. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, due to a petty dispute between the parties, a simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Doctor has found the injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners to be simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68654 of 2024(3) dt.10-02-2025 3/3 petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Sonbarsa Raj P.S. Case No. 145 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T