IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 102 Amit State of Haryana CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. has not been renewed on account of lodging of FIR under and Sections request made by him and there is no threat to the public peace and safety. Even the respectables had given statements before the SHO that arms licence of the petitioner considered in terms thereof. 2. course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions from Sh. Sanjeev Nehra, Assistant, states that respondent No.3 would not be averse to have a relook at the matter and decide afresh, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus f Haryana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Budhwar, Addl. A. G. Haryana. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that arms licence of the petitioner has not been renewed on account of lodging of FIR under and Sections 188/270 IPC, these having no relevance with regard to the request made by him and there is no threat to the public peace and safety. Even the respectables had given statements before the SHO that arms licence of the petitioner may be renewed and considered in terms thereof. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions from Sh. Sanjeev Nehra, Assistant, states that respondent No.3 would not be averse to have a relook at the matter and decide afresh, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19269-2024 (O & M) Date of decision: 13.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. R.S.Budhwar, Addl. A. G. Haryana. Learned counsel submits that arms licence of the petitioner has not been renewed on account of lodging of FIR under the Excise Act , these having no relevance with regard to the request made by him and there is no threat to the public peace and safety. Even the respectables had given statements before the SHO that arms may be renewed and prays his case be re- The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions from Sh. Sanjeev Nehra, Assistant, states that respondent No.3-District Magistrate, Jind, would not be averse to have a relook at the matter and decide afresh, request made by him and there is no threat to the public peace and safety. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.13 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-19269-2024 -2- taking note of the aforesaid submissions, within a period of 3 months, uninfluenced by the order impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 3. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 13.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.13 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.