SMT. SUNITA W/O LATE BHUPENDRA SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2148/2025 · 2025-05-09
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6861 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6861 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:19680] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2148/2025 Smt. Sunita W/o Late Bhupendra Sharma, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Sabji Mandi, Masjid Gali, Bhimganjmandi, Police Station Bhimganjmandi, District Kota (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota, District Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Waseem Akram Mr. Rajesh Gadwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 09/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0004/2025 registered at Police Station-Bhimganj Mandi, District-Kota City for the offence under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. The main co-accused has been enlarged on bail by the trial court. Though there are pendency of 13 cases against the petitioner in which five cases are related to alike nature but in two cases she has been acquitted. In all other cases pending, recovered contraband are below the commercial
[2025:RJ-JP:19680] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2148/2025] quantity. He further submits that the petitioner is a lady, who is about 54 years of age. The petitioner is behind the Bar since
27.01.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Smt. Sunita W/o Late Bhupendra Sharma shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/98