922 CA NO. 11146 OF 2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11146 OF 2025 IN FAST/13914/2025 Kalpana Sachin Satpute VERSUS The Manager Oriental Assurance Co Ltd Trough Its Auth Signatory ... Mr. Prateek Raviraj Talwar, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Dhananjay Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5047 OF 2025 IN FAST/13914/2025 The Manager, Oriental Assurance Co.ltd. Through Its Auth. Signatory Aurangabad VERSUS Kalpana Sachin Satpute And Ors … Mr. Dhananjay Deshpande, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Prateek Raviraj Talwar, Advocate fo Respondent No.1 to 5 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5048 OF 2025 IN FAST/13914/2025 The Manager, Oriental Assurance Co.ltd. Through Its Auth. Signatory Aurangabad VERSUS Kalpana Sachin Satpute And Ors … Mr. Dhananjay Deshpande, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Prateek Raviraj Talwar, Advocate fo Respondent No.1 to 5 .… CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 25.11.2025 PER COURT :- 1 of 4 (( 2 )) 922 CA NO. 11146 OF 2025 APPLICATION FOR STAY 1. This is an application seeking stay to the execution of the impugned judgment and award. 2. The learned advocate for the applicant / appellant submits that the entire amount as per the impugned judgment and award is deposited in this Court. 3. In view of the above, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and disposed of. APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF AMOUNT 1. This is an application seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited in this Court pursuant to the award. 2. Heard the learned advocates for both sides. 3. Learned advocate for respondent strongly opposed the application. 4. Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein and considering the arguments of both the sides, it would be proper to partly allow the application. Hence, the following order: 2 of 4 (( 3 )) 922 CA NO. 11146 OF 2025 ::ORDER:: a. The application is partly allowed. b. The applicants are permitted to withdraw 75% of the amount with accrued interest thereon deposited in this Court on furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. APPLICATION FOR DELAY 1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 28 days caused in filing the first appeal. 3. The learned Advocate for respondent strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4. Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence the following order: 3 of 4 (( 4 )) 922 CA NO. 11146 OF 2025 ::ORDER:: a. Civil Application is allowed and disposed of. b. The delay of 28 days caused in filing the first appeal is hereby condoned. IN FIRST APPEAL 1. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 27.01.2026. 2. Mr. Prateek Raviraj Talwar, learned Advocate waives service of notice for Respondent Nos.1 to 5. 3. Call for Record and Proceedings. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 4 of 4