Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68598 (KAR)

VELS STUDIOS AND ENTERTAINMENT PVT LTD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30163/2025 · 2025-10-25

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42224-DB WP No. 30163 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 30163 OF 2025 (GM-POL) BETWEEN: 1. VELS STUDIOS AND ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR MR. PRAKASH PALANI NO.24 AND 26 BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA BIDADI RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 562 109. …PETITIONER (BY SRI DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL OFFICE Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42224-DB WP No. 30163 of 2025 RAMANAGARA PARISARA BHAVAN NEAR D C OFFICE BANGALORE MYSORE ROAD RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 3. THE CHAIRMAN KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PARISARA BHAVANA NO.49, CHURCH STREET BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R-1 & SRI MAHESH CHOWDHARY A., ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT No.2 BEARING No.KSPCB/RO-RMN/F.No-G- 125/2023-24/19 DATED 08.04.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42224-DB WP No. 30163 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting the present petition and wishes to withdraw the same. 3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending application also stands disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16