Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6858 (UTT)

ATUL BANSAL ALIAS MANI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1054/2022 · 2025-06-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1054 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. H.C. Pathak, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 4. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 27.09.2022. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.06.2025 AK