Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68577 (KAR)

SRI GULSHANKUMAR SODHI v. SMT KAMALA RANI SODHI DEAD

RFA/2025/2021 · 2025-09-12

S Rachaiah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36250 RFA No. 2025 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2025 OF 2021 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI GULSHANKUMAR SODHI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS SMT. SUMAN SODHI W/O LATE GULSHANKUMAR SODHI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT C/O SURAJ MEHTA KOTHI NO.51/S, MODEL TOWN HISSAR HARYANA STATE - 125 001 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NISAR SAB., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT KAMALA RANI SODHI DEAD 2. SRI KAILASHCHAND SODHI S/O LATE KASTURILAL NIHALCHAND SODHI R/AT 302 PROMENADE PLACE PROMENADE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 062 3. SMT. LATHA SALHOTRA W/O SRI NADKISHORE SALHOTRA R/AT GROUND FLOOR SHETTAL PARK BLDG CHANDAVARKAR LANE BORIVAL (WEST), MUMBAI – 92. 4. SMT. SHAMA DHAWAN W/O SRI LALPAT DHAWAN 56 YEARS, R/AT 307 3RD FLOOR ABHINAV CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY BLDG Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36250 RFA No. 2025 of 2021 BHARUCHA ROAD, DALISAR DISTRICT THANA, MUMBAI. 5. SRI NARENDRA SODHI S/O LATE KASTURILAL NIHALCHAND SODHI 54 YEARS, R/AT 301 3RD FLOOR AKIL TOWER RATANNAGAR DALISAR EAST, DISTRICT THANA, MUMBAI 6. SRI JAGADISHKUMAR SODHI S/O LATE KASTURILAL NIHALCHAND SODHI 50 YEARS, R/AT 103/5 HARISMRUTHI 8TH ROAD, DOULATNAGAR BORIVALI EAST MUMBAI 66. 7. SRI. HARSHA KANOTRA W/O ASHWINI KANOTRA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT ASHOK VIHAR NEW DELHI C/O SMT. KAMALA RANI SODHI NO.103/5, HARISMRUTHI 8TH ROAD, DULATNAGAR BORIVALI EAST MUMBAI – 66 8. SRI K M RAJENDRAN S/O M KRISHNAMURTHY MAJOR, R/AT 3, 1ST MAIN C K C GARDEN BANGALORE - 560 027 9. THE SPECIAL LAO PODIUM BLOCK BANGALORE …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26/11/2020 PASSED IN OS.NO.4910/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGLAURU CITY, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND MESNE PROFIT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36250 RFA No. 2025 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Case called out. 2. The matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for eighth time. Despite giving sufficient opportunities, the learned counsel for the appellant has failed to comply with the office objections. Therefore, it appears that he is not interested to proceed with the case. Hence, it is appropriate to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance of office objections. 3. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution and non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE UN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6