M/S AL QAIMOON CONSTRUCTIONS v. M. RAJU AND ORS. (JAL SHAKTI / PHE DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/150/2022 · 2025-09-01
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6857 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6857 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 14 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 150/2022 In WP(C) 1754/2021 M/S Al Qaimoon Constructions. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. Mr. M. Raju & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Dar, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
ORDER 01.09.2025
01. Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Dar, learned Government Advocate submits that requisite compliance of the writ court direction has taken place by release of due amount in favour of the petitioner and, therefore, the compliance has been carried out, which warrants closure of this contempt petition.
02. Although counsel for the petitioner is not present, this court has no reason to discard the statement of Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Dar, learned Government Advocate in stating that compliance has been carried out.
03. In view of the above, the contempt petition is closed, with a liberty reserved in favour of the
petitioner that in case the petitioner would hold that due compliance has not taken place, then the petitioner would seek revival of the contempt petition provided the same takes places within a period of sixty days from the date of passing of this order.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 01.09.2025
“HAMID”