W.P.No.22138 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.22138 of 2025 N.Senthamilselvan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Chennai Metro Station Office Complex, Poonamallee High Road, Koyambedu, Chennai – 600 107. 2.The General Manager (Administrative), Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Poonamallee High Road, Koyambedu, Chennai. 3.The Regional Manager (South), Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Chennai South Region, No.9, Condron Smith Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai – 600 086. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22138 of 2025 proceedings Sae.Mu.A.No.AD1/37064/2024, dated 28.04.2025 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to sanction and disburse the petitioner's retirement benefits to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvaraj Panel Advocate O R D E R The instant writ petition has been filed with a prayer for issuing a certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings Sae.Mu.A.No.AD1/37064/2024, dated 28.04.2025 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to sanction and disburse the petitioner's retirement benefits to the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was terminated from service on account of his unauthorized absence for more than 3193 days. It is the submission of the petitioner that, though he was absent since 2014, no termination order had been passed, and only when he approached the authorities for re-employment, such termination order came to be passed. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22138 of 2025 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the materials available on records. 4. It is an admitted fact that the petitioner was unauthorizedly absent from 01.08.2014 to 30.04.2023, for almost 3193 days. Therefore, the mere delay in passing the termination order will not confer any benefit upon the petitioner to seek quashing of the impugned order. Furthermore, there is an abundant material on record to arrive at a conclusion that the order passed by the disciplinary authority is based on the available records and also on the admission made by the petitioner regarding his absence. 5. Hence, this Court do not find any merits in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. 23.06.2025 jas Index : Yes/No Speaking order /Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes/No 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22138 of 2025 To 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Chennai Metro Station Office Complex, Poonamallee High Road, Koyambedu, Chennai – 600 107. 2.The General Manager (Administrative), Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Poonamallee High Road, Koyambedu, Chennai. 3.The Regional Manager (South), Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Chennai South Region, No.9, Condron Smith Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai – 600 086. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22138 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. jas W.P.No.22138 of 2025 23.06.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis