Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68555 (BOM)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR LATUR v. VIJAYKUMAR VIRBHADRAPPA CHILLARGE

CA/8182/2023 · 2025-11-19

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 16 ca 8182.23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8182 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 10119 OF 2023 The State of Maharashtra, through Collector Latur and others .. Applicants Versus Vijaykumar Virbhadrappa Chillarge .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8184 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 11553 OF 2023 The State of Maharashtra, through Collector Latur and others .. Applicants Versus Kum. Pratibha Prakashrao Yerme Through Power of Attorney Holder Prakash Tulshiram Yerme .. Respondent Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, A.G.P. for the Applicants in both matters Shri R. R. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent in both matters. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2025. FINAL ORDER : . Heard both sides. 2. Applicants pray for condonation of delay of 260 and 264 days caused in preferring the first appeals. For the reasons stated in the applications, it is desirable to condone the delay. 2025:BHC-AUG:31933 2 16 ca 8182.23 There are no malafides on the part of the applicants in preferring the first appeals belatedly. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘E’ in C. A. No. 8182 of 2023 and prayer clause ‘B’ in C. A. No. 8184 of 2023. Office is directed to register the first appeals. The civil applications are disposed of. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Nov. 25