HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18766 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants, is taken on record. 3. Heard Sri Dileep Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri O. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 4. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the charge sheet No.628 of 2020 dated 25.10.2020 and cognizance order dated 05.11.2020 as well as entire proceeding of Case No.1610 of 2020 (State Vs. Sachin and another), arising out of Case Crime No.288 of 2020, under sections 323, 325, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Chhibramau, District Kannauj, on the basis of compromise. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is also on record as annexure No.S.A.- 1 to the supplementary affidavit filed today. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dileep Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sachin And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 7. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the charge sheet No.628 of 2020 dated 25.10.2020 and cognizance order dated 05.11.2020 as well as entire proceeding of Case No.1610 of 2020 (State Vs. Sachin and another), arising out of Case Crime No.288 of 2020, under sections 323, 325, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Chhibramau, District Kannauj, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. September 11, 2025 VKG A482 No. 18766 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad