- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38511 WP No. 23117 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.23117 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: DR. S. SHOBHA W/O LATE DR. S. JANARDHANA MURTHY, AGED 60 YEARS, NO.295/B, KRISHANA 2ND MAIN ROAD, OPP. VIVEKANANDA PARK, GIRINAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 085 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DR S SHOBHA, PARTY-IN-PERSON - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE CHIEF MINISTER INCHARGE OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 3. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGAR PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, HEAD OFFICE, BANGALORE 4. ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER WARD NO.162, SRINAGAR, Digitally signed by MADHUSHREE H Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38511 WP No. 23117 of 2017 BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGAR PALIKE, NEAR VIDYAPEETA CIRCLE, BANGALORE 5. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WARD NO.162, SRINAGAR, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGAR PALIKE, NEAR VIDYAPEETA CIRCLE, BANGALORE …RESPONDENTS THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 12.11.2013 BY REMITTING THE CASE TO THE EXECUTING COURT TO EXECUTE THE ORDER CHALLENGED IN EXECUTION NO.873/2010; b) REFER THE MATTER TO THE CONTEMPT BENCH OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT; c) DIRECT THE MAGISTRATE COURT BANGALORE TO TAKE COGNISANCE OF THE OFFENCE IN P.C.R.No.7296/2007 AND ETC THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER It is observed from the order sheet that the petitioner, who is party-in-person has not complied the office objections since filing of the writ petition. 2. Though the matter has been listed, the petitioner has not appeared before this Court and further it is observed that almost all since 2017 to till date, office - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38511 WP No. 23117 of 2017 objections have not been complied with. It appears that petitioner is not interested to comply with the office objections to prosecute the matter. 3. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE MH/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12