Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68542 (KAR)

SMT. SUNANDA v. KUM. M. DIVYA

RFA/1803/2023 · 2025-09-04

K S Hemalekha

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1803 OF 2023 BETWEEN SMT. SUNANDA, W/O LATE SRI. MARISHETTY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.182, 7TH CROSS, BHAVANI NAGAR, BSK 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560070. ….Appellant (By Sri. Ashwin S. Halady, Advocate) AND 1. KUM. M. DIVYA D/O. LATE. SRI. MARISHETTY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESIDING AT ACHHALU VILLAGE, KAILANCHA HOBLI, K.P.DODDI POST, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTION, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BANGALORE. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, I FLOOR, ORIENTAL BUILDING, ANIL KUMBLE CIRCLE, SMT.MARKS ROAD, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU. RFA.No.1803/2023 -------------------------- 2 4. SMT.JAYAMMA, W/O LATE SRI.CHELUVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT BYRAMANGALA VILLAGE, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT. KARNATAKA. 5. MASTER SHREYAS M., S/O LATE MARISHETTY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT NO.182, 7TH CROSS, BHAVANI NAGAR, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU …Respondents (By sriyuths. Prakash T Hebbar, Advocate for R1; Sri. K.N. Kasal, Advocate for R3; R2, R4 and R5 are served) This Regular First Appeal filed U/S 96 R/w Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC, against the Judgment and Decree dated 03.06.2023 passed in O.S. No.4313/2017 on the file of the LXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, partly decreeing the suit for declaration. This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Two weeks time is granted to file paper book, failing which the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE RFA.No.1803/2023 -------------------------- 3 NOTE: Vide Court Order dated.04.09.2025, the Advocate for Appellant has not filed paper book. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- [[[[[[[[[[[[[ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : BR R By : VL C By : RM