IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 121 Navdeep Kaur and another Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. for the petitioner. Ms. Navreet K. Barnala, AAG, Punjab. DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA 1. Petitioners petition under Article respondents No.2 and 3 to protect lives hands of private respondents No. 4 and liberty. 2. It is submitted that both petitioners are major. As per copy of Aadhaar Card of petitioner No. 1 (Annexure P 01.02.2001. On the other hand, as per copy of Aadhaar Card of petitioner (Annexure P-2), his date of birth is 11.09.2000 03.05.2025. Copy of Certificate of Marriage is Annexure P regarding performing of their marriage are Annexure P representation to the Se Annexure P-5. Petitioners family members/relatives threats from respondents IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6018 Date of decision: Navdeep Kaur and another State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Mr. Abhishek Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Navreet K. Barnala, AAG, Punjab. ***** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. Petitioners Navdeep Kaur and Pardeep Singh petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ndents No.2 and 3 to protect lives and liberty of hands of private respondents No. 4 to 6 and not to It is submitted that both petitioners are major. As per copy of Aadhaar Card of petitioner No. 1 (Annexure P . On the other hand, as per copy of Aadhaar Card of petitioner 2), his date of birth is 11.09.2000. They had performed Copy of Certificate of Marriage is Annexure P regarding performing of their marriage are Annexure P representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, 5. Petitioners performed marriage without consent and wishes of family members/relatives of petitioner No.1 and as such they are receiving threats from respondents No. 4 to 6. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 6018-2025 Date of decision: June 06, 2025 ....Petitioners .....Respondents DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Ms. Navreet K. Barnala, AAG, Punjab. Pardeep Singh have filed present 226 of the Constitution for issuance of directions to and liberty of the petitioners from the not to interfere in their personal lives It is submitted that both petitioners are major. As per copy of Aadhaar Card of petitioner No. 1 (Annexure P-1), her date of birth is . On the other hand, as per copy of Aadhaar Card of petitioner No.2 . They had performed marriage on Copy of Certificate of Marriage is Annexure P-3 and photographs regarding performing of their marriage are Annexure P-4. Petitioners also moved nior Superintendent of Police, Mansa, Punjab which is performed marriage without consent and wishes of of petitioner No.1 and as such they are receiving have filed present for issuance of directions to petitioners from the eir personal lives It is submitted that both petitioners are major. As per copy of 1), her date of birth is No.2 marriage on Petitioners also moved which is performed marriage without consent and wishes of of petitioner No.1 and as such they are receiving RITU KUKREJA 2025.06.06 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6018-2025 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4. On advance notice, Ms.Navreet K Barnala, AAG, Punjab and accepts notice on behalf of State. Complete copy of paper supporting documents is already supplied. 5. Considering nature of litigation, no purpose would be served by serving notice to private respondents. 6. I have considered the facts narrated in petition, according to both petitioners are major and they have performed marriage against family members/relatives of petitioner No.1, as a result they are threats from the hand of respondents No lives and liberty of petition consider representation of petitioners dated 03 appropriate steps to respondents No. 4 maintain their privacy and dignity. 7. Aforesaid pr validity of marriage and it will not protect them in case law or pending legal proceedings. 8. Petition is accordingly disposed of. June 06, 2025 ritu Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable: 2025 -2- Notice of motion to official respondents only. On advance notice, Ms.Navreet K Barnala, AAG, Punjab and accepts notice on behalf of State. Complete copy of paper supporting documents is already supplied. Considering nature of litigation, no purpose would be served by serving notice to private respondents. I have considered the facts narrated in petition, according to both petitioners are major and they have performed marriage against amily members/relatives of petitioner No.1, as a result they are threats from the hand of respondents No.4 to 6 and liberty of petitioners. Therefore, respondent entation of petitioners dated 03.06.2025 appropriate steps to protect lives and liberty of petitioners from the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6, considering threat perception, with further maintain their privacy and dignity. Aforesaid protection order will have no bearing on legality and validity of marriage and it will not protect them in case law or pending legal proceedings. Petition is accordingly disposed of. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable: Notice of motion to official respondents only. On advance notice, Ms.Navreet K Barnala, AAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of State. Complete copy of paper book along with Considering nature of litigation, no purpose would be served by I have considered the facts narrated in petition, according to which both petitioners are major and they have performed marriage against wishes of amily members/relatives of petitioner No.1, as a result they are apprehending to 6. It is duty of police to protect ers. Therefore, respondent No.2 is directed to .06.2025 (Annexure P-5) and take and liberty of petitioners from the hands of , considering threat perception, with further direction to otection order will have no bearing on legality and validity of marriage and it will not protect them in case there is any violation of (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No appears along with Considering nature of litigation, no purpose would be served by which wishes of apprehending police to protect directed to take and liberty of petitioners from the hands of direction to otection order will have no bearing on legality and there is any violation of RITU KUKREJA 2025.06.06 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document