1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100787 OF 2019 (POS) BETWEEN: SRI VINAYAK S/O MADHAV KAMATH, AGE:61 YEARS, OCC:RETIRED, R/O SIDDI SADAN, CIVIL COURT ROAD, KARWAR, TQ:KARWAR – 581 301. ...APPELLANT [BY SRI.AYUSH G. BHAT, AND SRI.U.A.GANAPATHI., ADVOCATES (ABSENT)] AND: 1. THE STATE BANK OF MYSORE, NOW MERGED WITH STATE BANK OF INDIA, BRANCH:KARWAR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, AT CIVIL COURT ROAD, KARWAR – 581 301. 2. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, STATE BANK OF MYSORE, NOW MERGED WITH STATE BANK OF INDIA, HEAD OFFICE, AT NO.6644, KEMPEGOUDA ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 009. 3. NAGENDRANATH S/O MADHAV KAMATH AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIDDI SADAN, CIVIL COURT ROAD, KARWAR-581301. …RESPONDENTS 2 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.10.2018 BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, KARWAR IN O.S.NO. 57/2016 AND JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASED IN R.A.NO.41/2018 DATED 19.07.2019M BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE OF KARWAR. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellant. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objection for third time. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed on 16.10.2019. Now we are almost completing the year 2022. It’s been three years. So far office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellant. Hence, the 3 Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and also for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE TKN