IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60393 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46402 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2025 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Chhabila Sah, S/o- Late Rajman Sah @ Rajwat Sah Village - Turkauliya Purvavi Tola, W.No- 7, P.S - Turkauliya, Dist- East Champaran 2. Sharda Devi, W/o- Chhabila Sah, Village - Turkauliya Purvavi Tola, W.No- 7, P.S - Turkauliya, Dist- East Champaran 3. Mukesh Sah, S/o- Chhabila Sah, Village - Turkauliya Purvavi Tola, W.No- 7, P.S - Turkauliya, Dist- East Champaran 4. Juli Devi, W/o- Mukesh Sah, Village - Turkauliya Purvavi Tola, W.No- 7, P.S - Turkauliya, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sapna Kumari, W/o- Rakesh Kumar, Village- Chhota Bariyarpur Ps- Chhatauni Dist- East Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Yerra Madhavi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 29-08-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that inadvertently, the husband’s name of petitioner no. 2 was typed as Chhabita Sah in place of Chhabila Sah and father’s name of petitioner no. 3 has also been wrongly typed as Chhabita Sah in place of Chhabila Sah. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that there is one more typographical mistake in the name of petitioner no. 4, which is typed as Jali Devi in place of Juli Devi. She submits that the aforesaid typing mistakes was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60393 of 2025(2) dt.29-08-2025 2/2 not intentional and it requires correction in the petition as well as in the order dated 30.07.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correct the aforesaid typographical mistakes in the petition and she is permitted to correct the same in the course of the day. 3. In view of the correction made by the learned counsel for the petitioners in the petition, office is directed to correct the aforesaid required correction also in the order dated 30.07.2025. 4. Accordingly, the modification application is allowed. khushbu/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T