Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6852 (RAJ)

NAND RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

CRLR/1267/2010 · 2025-05-05

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18842] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1267/2010 1. Nand Ram S/o Late Shri Gulla Ram R/o Plot No. 32, Uniaro Ka Rasta, Teja Ji Ki Bagichi, Purani Basti, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through PP 2. Ram Narayan @ Hanuman S/o Bheru Ram, R/o Tiwari Wala Tehsil And Distt. Jaipur 3. Smt. Mooli Devi W/o Narayan, R/o Tiwari Wala Tehsil And Distt. Jaipur 4. Chotu Ram Yadav S/o Mahadev Prasad Yadav, R/o Dhankya Tehsil And Distt. Jaipur 5. Ghasi S/o Bheru Ram, R/o Nandgaon Tehsil And Distt. Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Pratap Singh for Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Senior Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AAAG Mr. Rajesh Mehrishi Mr. Naman Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/05/2025 1. As per office report, the record of learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, has been weeded out. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent submits that a civil suit was filed to challenge the questioned document and same has already been dismissed. [2025:RJ-JP:18842] (2 of 2) [CRLR-1267/2010] 3. Having considered the submission, learned counsel for the parties admitted that the revision petition rendered infructuous. In view of same, the Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infrucuous. 4. Accordingly, the S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1267/2010 stands disposed of with pending application(s), if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /78