Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68513 (KAR)

SRI P SHANKARAPPA @ SHIVASHANKARAPPA v. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

MSA/47/2024 · 2025-12-10

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52394 MSA No. 47 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: SRI. P SHANKARAPPA @ SHIVASHANKARAPPA S/O PAPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT KODIHALLI DAKALE, THIMLAPURA VILLAGE, BAGURU HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 116 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. L.P. SURESH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HRP - 2, HASSAN HASSAN DISTRICT - 571 232 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CAUVERY WATER NIGAM LIMITED, HEMAVATHI PROJECT CHANNARAYAPATNA HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 116 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CAUVERY WATER NIGAM LIMITED WATER SURFACE DATA CENTER, BUILDINGS, 3 AND 4TH CROSS ROAD, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GOPALKRISHNA SOODI, AGA FOR R1) Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52394 MSA No. 47 of 2024 THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.09.2023 PASSED IN LAC (APPEAL) NO.81/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN DISTRICT, AT CHANNARAYAPATNA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 18.08.2016 PASSED IN LAC.31/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA. PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED UNDER 18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation. 2. Order sheet dated 03.12.2025 reads a under: "Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation. The matter is listed for eight time to comply with office objections. Sill, the office objections are not complied with. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford one more opportunity, list finally on 10.12.2025." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52394 MSA No. 47 of 2024 3. The matter is listed for ninth time for compliance of office objections. Still, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9