Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68511 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/20156/2025 · 2025-06-30

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:100696-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20156 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Sengar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Grievance of the petitioner is that without acquiring the land, the respondent authorities are raising certain construction/extend the Asphalt road (Damar Road) from the Agricultural Land belonging to the petitioner's plot No.273A, Rakba 0.0250 hectares and Plot No.273B, Rakba 0.3260 hectares situated in Village Kudwa (Jodhepura Dharmkata), Tehsil and Pargana-Narval, District Kanpur Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer that the grievance of petitioner may be addressed by the competent authority before acquiring the land or paying compensation. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending consideration. The writ petition, on consent, is disposed of asking the petitioner to move a fresh application ventilating all his grievance before the Competent Authority. In case any such application is moved by the petitioner within a week, we hope and trust that the said representation would be considered on merit by the Competent Authority expeditiously in accordance with law. Order Date :- 1.7.2025 A. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad