VIPIN BADAKOTI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME CIVIL SECRETARIAT
WPSS/716/2021 · 2025-07-21
Alok Kumar Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6847 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6847 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:6352 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS No.716 of 2021 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Heard Mr. Raghav Singhal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Piyush Garg,
learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G.S. Negi, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the respondents.
2. Heard on Withdrawal Application (IA No.8 of 2025).
3. Mr. Raghav Singhal, Advocate submitted that the petitioner has been advised to make a representation before the authority. Therefore, the petitioner has requested to permit him to withdraw present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, in case, the grievance remains unredressed.
4. The said request has not been opposed by the respondents.
5. The present Writ Petition (WPSS No.716 of 2021) is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file a fresh writ petition, as prayed, but, in accordance with law.
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) JKJ/Pant 21.07.2025