SHILPA RAJENDRA GADGIL v. SHRI ARVIND LATHI THE PRESIDENT EAST KHANDESH EDUCATION SOCIETY AND OTHERS
CP/633/2019 · 2025-10-16
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68454 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68454 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{1} cp633-19.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.633 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2804 OF 2013 Shilpa Rajendra Gadgil
PETITIONER VERSUS Shri Arvind Lathi, President, East Khandesh Education Society, and Others
RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Sujeet D. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. Pramod Gaikwad h/f Mr. A.G.Talhar, Adv for Respondents No. 1 and 4 Mr. Parth Shirsath h/f Mr. J. V. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ....… [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 16
th OCTOBER, 2025
ORDER :
1. Respondent No. 5, Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishd, Jalgaon has passed an order on 4th March, 2024, deciding the proposal of the Petitioner.
2. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that wrong proposal was forwarded by the Management and the Education
{2} cp633-19.doc Officer has erred in passing the order, rejecting the proposal of the Petitioner. He, therefore, contends that the order is not complied with.
3. We do not agree with the said submission. We cannot entertain the challenge to the order passed by the Education Officer, in Contempt jurisdiction.
4. In view of compliance of the order, the Contempt Petition is
disposed of, with liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the order passed by the Education Officer and also the proposal forwarded by the Management, on merits.
[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/cp633-19.doc