- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42090-DB RP No. 101 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY REVIEW PETITION NO. 101 OF 2023 BETWEEN: NARAYAN RAO, S/O LATE B.CHANNAKESHAVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/A 11-13-758, GREENHILLS COLONY, SOORANAGAR, HYDERABAD-500 035. …PETITIONER [BY SRI. PUTTE GOWDA K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: CANARA BANK, A BODY CORPORATE CONSTITUTED UNDER THE BANKING COMPANIES ACQUISITION, AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING ACT, 1970, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT NO. 112, J C ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL) …RESPONDENT [BY SRI.VIKRAM UNNI RAJAGOPAL, ADVOCATE] Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42090-DB RP No. 101 of 2023 THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XVVII RULE 1 OF CPC, 1908, PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO W.A.NO.2532 OF 2015 AND REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 03.02.2023 AND ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION AND REVIEW AND RECALL THE ORDER DATED: 03.02.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.A.NO.2532 OF 2015 AND RE-HEAR THE WRIT APPEAL AND ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL, AND PASS SUCH OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER, WRIT DIRECTION AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) The learned counsel for the review petitioner is absent. However, the learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. By the instant review petition, the judgment dated 03.02.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Appeal No.2532/2015 is sought to be reviewed. 3. We have perused the order sought to be reviewed and we find that, the grounds that have been - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42090-DB RP No. 101 of 2023 raised in the review petition do not exist in as much as, the issues have been sufficiently and appropriately dealt with by the Bench in the order sought to be reviewed. 4. For the reasons aforesaid, we find no error apparent on the face of the record that would merit the review of the impugned judgment. This petition is therefore, dismissed. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE KGR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7