Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68437 (ALL)

SEEMA PANDEY v. SMT. KAMINI PANDEY

A227/7262/2025 · 2025-07-17

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116388 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7262 of 2025 Petitioner :- Seema Pandey Respondent :- Smt. Kamini Pandey Counsel for Petitioner :- Seema Mishra Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "issue a order or direction to the learned Civil Judge, (J.D.) Mirzapur, to decide the 6c application original Suit No. 649 of 2023 (Seema Pandey Vs. Smt. Kamini Pandey), expeditiously at an early date and as also within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge, (J.D.) Mirzapur, to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad