217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31695-2025 Date of decision: 02.09.2025 VISHWAS ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr.Nishchal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate for the peoner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Mandeep Singh Lamba, Advocate for the complainant. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Pe22on for An2cipatory Bail under Sec2on 482 BNSS FIR No. Dated Pending Secons 148 07.04.2023 Central Faridabad, District Faridabad 420/406 IPC, 1860 1. The peoner incarcerated in the FIR caponed above has come up before this Court under Secon 482 of Bharaya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking ancipatory bail. 2. In para 13 of the bail peon, peoner’s counsel menoned that there is no other FIR lodged against the peoner whereas State counsel has referred to para 13 of the status report in which peoner is involved in 07 more cases. 3. Faced with this situaon, counsel for the peoner wishes to withdraw the present peon with liberty to file afresh. 4. Given above, the present peon is disposed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. All the pending applicaons, if any, stand dispose of. 5. It is clarified that if the peoner files the fresh peon, the filing and withdrawal of the present peon because of the non-menon of criminal history shall not come in their way. 02.09.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.09.03 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document