WP Crl. No. 696 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 696 of 2025 Parimala W/o.Vadivelan, No.22, J Block, Jai Bheem Nagar, Sadaramangala, Kadugodi Plantation, Bangalore - 560 067. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupattur District, Tirupattur. 2. The Inspector of Police, Tirupattur Taluk Police Station, Tirupattur District. 3. Umapathi S/o.Valli Kannan, No.691, 2nd Cross Street, Ambedkar Nagar, Viginapura, Bangalore - 16. ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition (Criminal) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1 and 2 Respondents to give police protection to the petitioner and her plot the property situated in survey No.63/1 Sakthi Nagar, Plot No.2, extended 12011/2 sq.ft. Koneri Kuppam Village, Tirupattur Taluk, Tirupattur District and safe guard from the 3rd Respondents based on the petitioner complaint dated on 22.07.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 696 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner: Mr.T. Saravanan For Respondents: Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for R1 & R2 ORDER This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her property comprised in Survey No.63/1, to an extent of 2102 ½ sq.ft, situated at Sakthi Nagar, Plot No.2, Koneri Kuppam, Tirupattur Taluk. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the 1st and 2nd respondents. Perused the materials available on record. 3. The petitioner is none other than the sister of the third respondent herein. Both are residing at Bangalore. However, the petitioner has sought for police protection for her life and her property comprised in Survey No.63/1, to an extent of 2102 ½ sq.ft, situated at Sakthi Nagar, Plot No.2, Koneri Kuppam, Tirupattur Taluk. 4. On instruction, the learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the 1st and 2nd respondents submitted that, so far, no complaint has been received from the petitioner. Even according to the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 696 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 petitioner, the complaint was sent only by post. The said property is lying vacant and no one is residing there. Both the petitioner and the third respondent are residing at Bangalore. 5. In view of the above, the prayer sought for in this petition cannot be considered. Thus, the writ petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to lodge a fresh complaint on a fresh cause of action. No costs. 09-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No LPP To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupattur District, Tirupattur. 2. The Inspector of Police, Tirupattur Taluk Police Station, Tirupattur District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 696 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN J. LPP WP Crl. No. 696 of 2025 09-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis