IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2341 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Rajesh Sharma & another …….Petitioners Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated April 2025, issued the signatures of Director Education, Himachal Pradesh, learned Additional Advocate General states that representation filed by the petitioners for redressal of their grievance stands rejected vide order dated 28.03.2025 and as such, present petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Having carefully perused the aforesaid communication, this Court finds that relief, as sought in the instant petition, has been refused on the ground set out in the order. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. Faced with aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, laying therein challenge to afore order passed on the representation of the petitioners. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 11, 2025 (shankar)