Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68414 (PNJ)

IQRAM KHAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/5990/2025 · 2025-06-05

Sudeepti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5990-2025 (O&M) 115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Iqram Khan State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE Present: Mr. SUDEEPTI SHARMA 1. Through the instant petition, as filed under Constitution of India respondent Nos respondent Nos. 5 to 10 harassing/threatening 2. Notice of motion to the official respondent(s) only. 3. On the asking of the Court, M accepts notice on behalf of the official respondent(s) 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the representation Annexure P-1 and P 5. Learned State counsel do counsel for the petitioner 02.06.2025 (Annexure P a period of four weeks 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR Date of Decision : VERSUS Haryana and others HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) Through the instant petition, as filed under Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of directions upon s. 2 to 4, to protect his life, liberty and respondent Nos. 5 to 10 and also to restrain the said respondent /threatening the petitioner or interfering in Notice of motion to the official respondent(s) only. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Shivendra Swaroop accepts notice on behalf of the official respondent(s) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied representation (s) dated 02.06.2025, which ha 1 and P-2), be looked into. Learned State counsel does not object to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and contends that (Annexure P-1 and 2) filed by the petitioner would be decided within a period of four weeks from today by passing a speaking orde -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RWP-5990-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 05.06.2025 ....Petitioner ....Respondent SUDEEPTI SHARMA , Advocate for the petitioner. Through the instant petition, as filed under Article 226 of the sought issuance of directions upon official liberty and property at the hands of and also to restrain the said respondents from the petitioner or interfering in his peaceful life. Notice of motion to the official respondent(s) only. Shivendra Swaroop, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the official respondent(s). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied , which have been placed on record ( not object to the prayer made by learned and contends that the representation (s) dated filed by the petitioner would be decided within by passing a speaking order. - ....Respondents of the official property at the hands of from Haryana, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied (as not object to the prayer made by learned dated filed by the petitioner would be decided within Gaurav Arora 2025.06.05 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-5990-2025 (O&M) 6. In view of the above direction to respondent No. decide the above referred to and P-2) of the petitioner speaking order. 7. Disposed of accordingly. June 05, 2025 Gaurav Arora Whether speaking/non Whether reportable 2025 (O&M) In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3–Superintendent of Police, above referred to representation (s) ) of the petitioner, within a period of four weeks Disposed of accordingly. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- , the instant petition is disposed of with a of Police, Nuh District Mewat, to representation (s) dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P , within a period of four weeks from today by passing a (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE speaking : Speaking : Yes/No - , the instant petition is disposed of with a , to (Annexure P-1 by passing a Gaurav Arora 2025.06.05 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document