SAJAD AHMAD WANI v. ABDUL HAMID FANI (SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/153/2022 · 2025-05-07
Sanjay Dhar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6841 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6841 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 42. Regular Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 153/2022 in[SWP 1069/2017].
SAJAD AHMAD WANI.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS.
Through: Ms. Shaila Shameem, Assisting Counsel .
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
ORDER 07.05.2025
01.
The petitioner through the medium of the present contempt petition is seeking implementation of Order dated 08.06.2017 passed by the Writ Court whereby the respondents were directed to decide the representation of the petitioner.
02.
The respondents have filed their Compliance Report and along with the Compliance Report they have also placed on record copy of the
Consideration Order No. 23/CEO Kup of 2024 dated 27.06.2024. Vide the said
Consideration order, the claim of the petitioner has been found to be without any merit and has been rejected. .
03.
In view of the fact that the respondents have considered the claim of the petitioner and passed an order thereon, the order of the Writ Court stands complied with. Thus, no case for proceeding against the respondents is made
out. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are closed and the contempt petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the consideration
order passed by the respondents by way of an appropriate proceedings.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 07.05.2025 Showkat Khan