Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010021642023 2025:GAU-AS:10897 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/459/2023 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED HEAD OFFICE AT 24, WHITES ROAD, CHENNAI AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI- 781005. VERSUS AYNUL HAQUE BARBHUYAN AND 10 ORS. S/O LATE MUFASSIL ALI BARBHUYAN, VILL.- BARNAGAD, P.O.- KALIBARI BAZAR, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN- 788150. 2:MUST AMINA BEGUM BARBHUYAN W/O LATE AYNUL HOQUE BARBHUYAN VILL.- BARNAGAD P.O.- KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788150. 3:MUST JASMINE SULTANA BARBHUYAN W/O LATE DILWAR HUSSAIN BARBHUYAN VILL.- BARNAGAD P.O.- KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 PIN- 788150. 4:MD ZARIF ARMAN BARBHUYAN S/O LATE DILWAR HUSSAIN VILL.- BARNAGAD P.O.- KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788150. 5:MD SAMSUL HAQUE MAZUMDAR S/O LATE ARSHAD ALI MAZUMDAR VILL.- CHIRUKHANDI(RAMNAGAR) P.S.- SILCAHR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788751. 6:SATYABRATA DAS S/O LATE JOGODISH DAS R/O COLLEGE ROAD (HAILAKANDI TOWN) P.O. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788151. 7:NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. CLUB ROAD CAPITAL TRAVEL BUILDING P.O.- SILCHAR P.S. AND DIST.- SILCHAR CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001. 8:MD. ASRAB ALI S/O ASSODDAR ALI Page No.# 3/4 VILL.- DHOLIDAHAR P.S.- PABCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788802. 9:MD. SALIM UDDIN S/O TAJ UDDIN R/O UTTAR KANCHANPUR P.S. AND DIST.- PANCHGRAM HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 10:ABDUL LATIF LASKAR S/O KATU MIR LASKAR VILL.- KANAKPUR PART 1 P.O.- KANAKPUR P.S.- SILCHAR PIN- 788802 DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. 11:CHOLAMANDALAM M/S GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AASCHA COMPLEX 4TH FLOOR OPPOSITE S.B. DEBORAH COLLEGE G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI- 781007 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K BHATTA, MS L SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R GOSWAMI (r-11), MR. A SHAKIL (R-1 TO 4),MR. M TALUKDAR (R-1 TO 4),MS. M SAIKIA (r-11) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 18.08.2025 Page No.# 4/4 Heard Mr. K. K. Bhatta, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent/opposite party Nos. 1 to 4 and Ms. M. Saikia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/opposite party No.11. 2. This is an application, filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking condonation of delay of 89 days in filing the connected appeal. 3. The grounds of delay in preferring the connected appeal has been explained in paragraph No.5 of the application. 4. The learned counsel for the respondents/opposite parties have no objection in condoning the delay of 89 days. 5. On consideration of the explanation given in paragraph No.5, this Court is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in not preferring the connected appeal within the stipulated time. 6. In view of above, the delay of 89 days in filing the connected appeal is hereby condoned. 7. With the above, This I.A. stands disposed of. 8. The Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list it for admission. JUDGE Comparing Assistant