IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58393 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2025 Thana- ALIPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar S/o Rajendra Mahto R/o Village- Kespa, P.S.- Alipur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Paras Nath For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 02-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 117(2), 303(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 20 years and the informant alleges that accused persons came and Manish @ Ajeet assaulted Chintu by khanti causing injury on head, further Rajendra assaulted him by fasuli causing injury on head and also assaulted his mother by fasuli causing injury on hand, thereafter Sanjeev, Randhir and Hemanti Devi with khanti, rod and lathi assaulted him, his Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58393 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/3 father, mother and Chintu causing injury on head and finger of his father, thereafter Hemanti Devi snatched chain of his mother. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant alleges that petitioner with Khanti along with others assaulted father, mother, informant and Chintu. It is further submitted that allegation of assault is not specific and the entire family members have been implicated. It is next submitted that Rajendra Mahto and one another had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 52709/2025 and the same was allowed by an order dated 02.09.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and also taking into consideration the order dated 02.09.2025 in Cr. Misc. No.52709/2025, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58393 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Alipur P.S. Case No.55/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T