Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CM-3698-CWP-2025 in/& CWP-19307-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.05.2025 Darshan Kumar and Others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and Another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. B.S. Patwalia and Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocates for the petitioners Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG Punjab ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) CM-3698-CWP-2025 For the reasons mentioned in the application for disposing of the main case, the same stands allowed. Main case is preponed and taken on board today itself. CWP-19307-2020
1.
Learned counsel states that the petitioners were working as Staff Nurses and ought to have been regularised in terms of the policy dated 18.03.2011 on completion of 3 years of service rendered on contract basis. The case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Sukhjad Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Another, decided on 19.12.2018, against which LPA and SLP stand dismissed on 28.03.2022 and 02.05.2025 respectively, which was followed in Gurmeet Kaur and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others, CWP- 23027-2016, decided on 24.09.2024, Annexure A-1, to which no challenge was MOHIT 2025.05.23 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-19307-2020 (O&M) -2- made and Rakhal and Others vs. State of Punjab and Another, CWP-11499- 2021, disposed of on 09.01.2025. Pursuant whereof similarly circumstanced employees have been extended the benefit as claimed in this petition.
2. Learned State counsel despite best efforts has been unable to controvert regards the factual position and resist disposal of the petition in terms thereof or cite any contrary law.
3.
Disposed of in terms of Sukhjad Singh (supra).
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE 21.05.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2025.05.23 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document