[2025:RJ-JP:14202] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 85/2022 Rajendra Mahavar S/o Govind Mahavar, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Arniya Baswa Kolwa Dausa Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Additional Director General Of Police (Crime), P.h.q. Jaipur 3. Supretendent Of Police, Distt. Dausa 4. S.h.o., Ps Kolwa Dausa Raj. 5. The Director, Central Bureau Of Investigation Plot No. 5-B Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-110003 6. Joint Director, Special Crime Zone Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi 7. Bansi Mastar Gurjar S/o Not Known, R/o Arniya Baswa Kolva Dausa Raj. 8. Ramjilal S/o Hatila, R/o Tila Walw Baswa Kolwa Dausa Raj. 9. Ram Singh Gurjar S/o Not Known, R/o Arniya Baswa Kolva Dausa Raj. 10. Mahendra Gurjar S/o Not Known, R/o Arniya Baswa Kolva Dausa Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 27/03/2025 1. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the official respondents to conduct fair, impartial and unbiased investigation in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.173/2021, registered at Police Station Kolva, Distt. Dausa. [2025:RJ-JP:14202] (2 of 2) [CRLW-85/2022] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report No.2199 dated 26.06.2022 duly signed by SHO, Police Station Kolva, Distt. Dausa, which is taken on record. As per the factual report, a negative Final Report No.02/2022 has been filed and the same has also been submitted before the Court of learned Additional District Judge, SC/ST Act Cases, Dausa, on 19.02.2022. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.7 to 10 submits that the complainant party has already filed a protest petition in the matter before the learned Trial Court. 5. Thus, in view of the negative Final Report filed in the matter and also the complainant party has filed protest petition before the learned Trial Court, the present writ petition has rendered infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAHIL SONI /309