- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31387 CRL.P No. 11782 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11782 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI MOHAMMED OMAR S/O. NISAR PASHA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.U-11, NEW NO.28, 7TH MAIN ROAD, PADARAYANAPURA, JJR NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 026. 2. SMT. HALEEMA KHANUM, W/O. NISAR PASHA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.U-11, NEW NO.28, 7TH MAIN ROAD, PADARAYANAPURA, JJR NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 026. 3. SRI. NISAR PASHA, S/O. ABDUL SHUKUR, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.U-11, NEW NO.28, 7TH MAIN ROAD, PADARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 026. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. TEJAS N.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31387 CRL.P No. 11782 of 2025 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA WEST WOMEN POLICE, BENGALURU - 560 023. (REPRESENTED BY LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HCK, BANGALORE - 01) 2. SMT. AFREEN KHANUM, W/O. MOHAMMED OMAR, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/AT NO.24, 7TH MAIN ROAD, PADARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 026. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, SPP FOR R1) CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CC.NO.23165/2024 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.34/2024 OF WEST WOMEN P.S., BENGALURU, ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ACJM, BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498(A), 323, 342, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC, U/S 3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT, 1961, AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER This petition is filed by the petitioners/husband and his parents seeking quashing of the proceedings in C.C.No.23165/2024 for the offences punishable under - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31387 CRL.P No. 11782 of 2025 Sections 498A, 323, 342, 504, 506 and Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, pending on the file of the XXIV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru. 2. Today, a joint memorandum, duly signed by the parties and their respective counsel, has been filed before this Court. Along with the joint memo, the parties have placed reliance upon the settlement recorded in O.S.No.368/2024, which reflects the mutual understanding and agreement between the parties. 3. This Court, in order to ensure voluntariness, has enquired from respondent No.2/wife whether any coercion, undue influence, or pressure was exerted on her to concede for closure of these criminal proceedings. She has submitted on oath that she has voluntarily entered into the compromise recorded in O.S.No.368/2024 and, in accordance with the terms of the compromise, she has already received a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- by way of demand draft. She further states that as per the terms of - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31387 CRL.P No. 11782 of 2025 the settlement, the petitioner/husband was required to pay the balance amount of Rs.15,00,000/- in order to secure the closure of the criminal proceedings. 4. Today, the petitioner/husband has paid the balance amount of Rs.15,00,000/- by way of demand draft. Since the entire permanent alimony agreed under the compromise has now been fully paid to respondent No.2/wife, she has requested this Court to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.23165/2024, pending for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 342, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 5. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties, and considering that the marriage between the petitioner/husband and respondent/wife has been dissolved and the permanent alimony has been fully discharged, this Court is of the opinion that, as the complainant/respondent No.2 is no longer willing to - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31387 CRL.P No. 11782 of 2025 prosecute the criminal proceedings, it would be just and proper, in the interest of justice, to quash the same. 6. This Court is also of the view that, in light of the fact that Section 498A of IPC is non-cognizable, and no heinous or grievous offences are involved in the charge sheet, it is appropriate to exercise the plenary jurisdiction conferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to prevent abuse of the process of law and to secure the ends of justice. 7. For the foregoing reasons, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER (i) The Criminal Petition is allowed. (ii) The proceedings in C.C.No.23165/2024, pending on the file of the XXIV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 342, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31387 CRL.P No. 11782 of 2025 1961, insofar as the petitioners are concerned, are hereby quashed. SD/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE KTY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 128