HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22083 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The accused applicant is involved in Case Crime No.30 of 2025, registered as Case No. 502 of 2025 (State Vs. Liyakat and others) under Sections 61(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 318(4), 319(2), 351(2) (3) of B.N.S., Police Station Fareedpur, District Bareilly. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is a marginal witness to the sale deed. Learned counsel further argued that the applicant is not a beneficiary of the alleged transaction and that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 21.01.2025. 4. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application but could not dispute the arguments advanced by learned Counsel for the applicants. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhanshu Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gyandeep Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) allegations, case of the applicant is distinguishably from the case of co- accused, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 6. Let the applicant Gyandeep Singh be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime number on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. v) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the informant would be free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this Court. September 9, 2025 S.Ali BAIL No. 22083 of 2025 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad