Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6833 (AP)

Smt.P.Sri Devi, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/3652/2024 · 2025-08-11

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010065502024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3652/2024 Between: 1. SMT.P.SRI DEVI, W/O.P.SRINIVASA RAJU, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE-WIFE, 2. .SMT.P.SAVITRAMMA, W/O.ATE P.R.K.RAJU, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE-WIFE, 3. P.GOPALA KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O.LATE P.R.K.RAJU, AGED- 55 YEARS, OCC- SERVICE, ALL ARE R/O.D.NO.5-12/6, MARIKALAVALASA, PARADESIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(REVENUE), DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 4 failed to regularize the petitioners house sites submitted through Meeseva application Nos.(l)VZG1001-4-73845, DT 05-08-2016 in D.No.5-12/6, (2)VZG1001-4-73790, DT 30-07-2016 in D.No.5-12/3 and (3)VZG1001-4 97837, DT- 12-12-2017 in Sy.No. 174/2 and 173/3 in Marikavalasa, Paradesipalem, Visakhapatnann Rural Mandal, 2 Visakhapatnam District for an extents of (1)327 Sq.Yards (2)469 Sq.Yards and (3)386 Sq.Yards as arbitrary, illegal against Art. 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners representations Dt:29-05-2023 to regularize the petitioners house sites as per Meeseva application Nos.(l)VZG1001-4-73845, DT:05-08-2016 in D.No.5-12/6, (2)VZG1001-4-73790, DT:30-07-2016 in D.No.5-12/3 & (3)VZG1001-4-97837, DT: 12-12-2017 in Sy.No. 174/2 & 173/3 in Marikavalasa, Paradesipalem, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District by a consequential APOnline Application Nos.(l)RUEGLN012000000944D, (2) RUEGLN012000009437 & RUEGLN012000009345, Dt:28-02-2020 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SAIDULU SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 3652 of 2024 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition by granting leave to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioners to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 12.08.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO W.P.No. 3652 OF 2024 Date: 12.08.2025 SPP