Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68329 (KAR)

MAN TAKRAF (INDIA) PVT LTD v. BELLARY STEELS AND ALLOYS LTD

COP/49/2001 · 2025-11-20

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47934 COP No. 49 of 2001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY PETITION NO. 49 OF 2001 BETWEEN: MAN TAKRAF (INDIA) PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT,1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.24, WALLACE GARDEN, 3RD STREET, MADRAS - 600 006. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. KAREL MEIJERS G.L., …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAY SHANKAR ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: BELLARY STEELS AND ALLOYS LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT S-10/11, P.B.NO.19, ANANTHAPUR ROAD, BELLARY REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VINAYA KEERTHY M., ADVOCATE) THIS COMPANY PETITION IS FILED FOR WINDING UP UNDER SECTION 433 (e) AND (f), 434 (1) (a) AND 439 (1) (b) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47934 COP No. 49 of 2001 THIS COMPANY PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Vinaya Keerthy.M., counsel for the respondent has appeared in person. A perusal of the petition papers would reflect that the petitioner is represented by the office of Vijay Shankar Associates. The petition is filed in 2001. Now we are in November, 2025. It's almost 25 years. As already noted above, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22