IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.122 Swatantar Kumar The General Manager, CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Rohiteshwar Singh Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Maninder Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit and 4 to take a decisi behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction decision on the representation petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to concerned, preferably within 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 08.07.2025 Prince Whether speaking/reasoned IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus The General Manager, Northern Railway and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Rohiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 and 6/UOI. Maninder Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with to take a decision on the legal notice dated 27.0 the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent representation dated 27.03.2025 (Annexure P petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to , preferably within 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17179-2025 Date of decision : 08.07.2025 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI for the petitioner. respondents No.1 to 3 and 6/UOI. Maninder Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be h a direction to respondents No.2 .03.2025 (Annexure P-8), made on Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to respondents No.2 and 4 to take a (Annexure P-8), made on behalf of the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE : Yes / No PRINCE SAINI 2025.07.09 22:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document