[2025:RJ-JP:9248] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2217/2025 1. Parvindra Singh S/o Shri Gurubaks Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Talvandi, Police Station Talvandi Savo, District Bhatinda, Punjab. 2. Jagroop Singh S/o Dilip Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Talvandi, Police Station Talvandi Savo, District Bhatinda, Punjab. (At Present Accused- Petitioner Confined In District Ajmer) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of this bail application qua accused-petitioner No.1 i.e. Parvindra Sing S/o Shri Gurubaks Singh with liberty to renew the prayer of bail after submission of result of investigation. 2. Permission sought for is granted. 3. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn qua accused-petitioner No.1 i.e. Parvindra Sing S/o Shri Gurubaks Singh with liberty as prayed for. 4. So far as accused-petitioner No.2 Jagroop Singh S/o Dilip Singh is concerned, he has preferred the instant bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. He is arrested in connection with FIR [2025:RJ-JP:9248] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2217/2025] No.55/2025 registered at Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 8/18(C) of NDPS Act. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. He submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner No.2- Jagroop Singh. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.01.2025 and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner No.2. 7. I have considered the contentions. 8. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner No.2 and period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 9. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner No.2- Jagroop Singh S/o Dilip Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court [2025:RJ-JP:9248] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2217/2025] with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 10. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner No.1 shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 11. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 12. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/347