- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34480-DB WA No. 799 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI WRIT APPEAL NO. 799 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. RUKHMAI INFRASTRUCTURES PVT LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY PRASHANT JAYNARAYAN SHUKLA HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PLOT NO.163 SUGANDH, 1ST FLOOR NEAR LENDRA PARK RAMDASPET, NAGPUR - 440 010 …APPELLANT (BY SRI RAKSHITH PAI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SUNDARA RAMAN M V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD. THROUGH SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (MINES) HAVING OFFICE AT NO. 82 SHAKTI BHAVAN 3RD FLOOR, RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, ADVOCATE GENERAL/SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AJAY J NANDALIKE, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34480-DB WA No. 799 of 2025 THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 07.04.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION No.34794 OF 2024 AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU ,CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU,CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 07.04.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.35167/2024, 34794/2024 and 35279/2024. The present appeal is confined to the impugned order insofar as it relates to Writ Petition No.34794/2024. The said petition was filed challenging a tender which has since been withdrawn. Therefore, the appellant's grievance in respect of the tender that was subject matter of challenge in Writ Petition No.34794/2024 does not survive. 2. The present appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34480-DB WA No. 799 of 2025 3. We clarify that all rights and contentions of the parties are reserved and the disposal of the present appeal could not preclude the appellant from advancing such contentions as raised in other appeal. 4. Pending application stands disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26