Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68313 (PNJ)

ARJUN MAURYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5981/2025 · 2025-06-05

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CRWP-5981-2025 Date of decision: 05.06.2025 ARJUN MAURYA AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Arjun Maurya and Niharika Sharma have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their lives and personal liberty from private respondents i.e. respondents No.4 and 5. The contention of the petitioners is that both are major, aged 23 years and 18 years respectively. In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The petitioners further contend that they have performed marriage against the wishes of their parents. The marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 02.06.2025 at Prachin Pashupati Nath Shiv Mandir, MDC, Sector-6, Panchkula as per VISHAL SHARMA 2025.06.05 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-5981-2025 -2- Hindu rites and ceremonies. A copy of marriage certificate (Annexure P-4) issued by the aforesaid Mandir has also been appended. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that a representation dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-6) has also been submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District SAS Nagar, Mohali. Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, the petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station- Naya Gaon, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation (Annexure P-6) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners, nothing in this order shall be VISHAL SHARMA 2025.06.05 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-5981-2025 -3- construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station-Naya Gaon, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali for requisite compliance. The petition is disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUNE 05, 2025 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.06.05 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document