Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:6875 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/869/2025
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Ms. Aishwarya Thapliyal,
learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Siddharth Bisht, learned A.G.A. and Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Present applicant Ravi Srivastava, s/o Late Jagdish Srivastava is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 16.12.2024, bearing FIR No. 333 of 2024, registered at P.S. I.T.I. District Udham Singh Nagar wherein the present applicant, by showing his name as Ravipal, has been implicated along with three others for the offence punishable under Section 109 of BNS 2023. On completion of investigation the applicant has been charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Section 109(1), 3(5), 351(2) and 352 of BNS 2023.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and this is a case of no injury. She further submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 16.12.2024 and the charge sheet has already been filed on
11.03.2025. She further argued that other two co-accused, namely, Happy and Suraj who were named in the FIR were exonerated during investigation. She further submits that in addition to this, there is one criminal case against the applicant in which he is already bailed out.
5. Mr. Siddharth Bisht, learned A.G.A. for the State has not disputed this fact that the charge sheet has already been filed on 11.03.2025, and it is a case of
2025:UHC:6875 no injury and in another case, the applicant is already bailed out.
6. After hearing the arguments of the
learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the charged sheet has already been filed and further it is a case of no injury and applicant is languishing in jail since 16.12.2024, and in another case the applicant is already bailed out this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant Ravi Srivastava be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
05.08.2025 Parul
2025:UHC:6875