Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6830 (JHR)

ROSHAN ALAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1681/2025 · 2025-03-12

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1681 of 2025 ------ Roshan Alam, aged aobut-30 years Son of Mokhtar Hasen, Resident of village- Manikpara, P.O. Pakur, P.S.- Pakur (M), District- Pakur. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-12-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No.239 of 2024 instituted under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/ 109/303(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant and committed theft of Rs.3,000/- and mobile phone. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the alleged injury sustained by the informant is not on vital part of the body as the injury is on back of the informant. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no intention to kill anybody. Drawing attention of this court towards para-12 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from the date of the order and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Pakur in connection with Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No.239 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/