Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6829 (RAJ)

SURESH S/O SHRI SHANKARLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2274/2025 · 2025-02-28

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8903] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 2274/2025 Suresh S/o Shri Shankarlal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Likhma Ka Bas At Present Nada Charanwas, Police Station Khatushyamji, District Sikar. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sikar). Accused----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pooran Chand Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 28/02/2025 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused- application had been arrest in connection with FIR No.1/2022 registered at Police Station Jeenmata, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 341/149, 323/149, 302/149 & 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the name of the accused has not been specified in the FIR. It is further submitted that no criminal antecedents are pending against the accused-applicant. Nevertheless, the issue whether the applicant was a juvenile at the time of commission of the alleged offence is also pending before the Revisional Court. Moreover, there has been a prolonged period of custody, as the [2025:RJ-JP:8903] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2274/2025] applicant is behind bars ever since 11.10.2022 and the trial will take its own time. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that the co-accused Rajuram @ Raju has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20.08.2024 and Rajendra @ Raju has been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.02.2025. Lastly, it is submitted that the case of the accused- applicant is on better footing. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has stoutly opposed the instant application and contentions made by the counsel representing the accused-applicant. 5. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the instant matter, and taking note of the fact that name of the applicant has not been specified in the FIR; that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail vide order(s) dated 20.08.2024 and 04.02.2025; that the applicant has been behind bars ever since 11.02.2022 and that there are no criminal antecedents pending against the accused-applicant, this Court deems it appropriate to allow the instant second bail application. 6. Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Suresh S/o Shri Shankarlal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/2